Since the beginning of civilization, humankind has looked up at the stars with curiosity. It is only natural to wonder what seemingly infinite array of planets lies outside of our solar system, and humankind has incrementally developed better tools for cataloguing and understanding the cosmos. Modern technology allows us to survey thousands of exoplanets (planets outside of our solar system), and the PHL (Planetary Habitability Laboratory) has compiled a database of of these findings.
However, at first glance, it is hard to make much of this sprawling list of planets. The units of measure that describe celestial bodies are so large, that is difficult to understand their vastness without some baseline for comparison. The number of planets is also overwhelming, and the column names for the data set are not all immediately understandable. All of these factors make this database difficult to understand for the layman.
We intend to reconcile people’s natural curiosity about exoplanets with the overwhelming nature of the data regarding exoplanets through creating a series of visualizations. By creating a web page that visualizes and explains various aspects of the known exoplanets we will be able to satiate people’s curiosity towards space. Watch the video below to get a quick tour, or scroll down to begin.
This blue dot represents Earth, and currently is the only known planet to support life as we known it.
Let's add some perspective. Solely looking at distance the closest exoplanet to Earth is approximately 1.3 parsecs. Just one parsec alone is 3.26 light years (3.086 × 1013 kilometers) away.
Taking a big step back to 150 parsecs the amount of exoplanets explode.
Going even further the farthest exoplanet ever discovered is only about 8,500 parsecs. The Milky Way galaxy is about 30,000 parsecs long. Feel small yet?
There are a few different means to discover planets in different solar systems. Through 2001-2005, radial velocity was the predominant discovery method. Radial velocity can be measured because when planets orbit stars, they cause the star they are orbiting to wobble slightly. This wobble changes the light that astronomers observe, allowing astronomers to identify new planets. Transit was the second most prominent discovery method over this period. Transit is when the amount of observable light from a star decreases due to a planet passing between the star and the observer. Transit has become an increasingly popular method for exoplanet discovery because of the increasing power of telescope satellites.
From 2006-2010, there was a notable increase in exoplanet discoveries. While radial velocity discovery still dominated as the primary discovery method through this time period, transit became an increasingly relevant method for planet discovery. The rise in transit planet discovery can be attributed to the fact that satellites with powerful telescopes were being increasingly used over this period. By deploying these satellites into our orbit, NASA and other space oriented organizations can more easily help researchers identify new exoplanets. During this time period, there were also a notable number of microlensing, imaging, and pulsar discoveries as well.
From 2010-2016 there was a boom of exoplanet discoveries that corresponded to improved utilization of transit planet discovery. The increase in transit based discoveries can mostly be attributed to the Kepler mission. This mission began on October of 2009, when the Kepler satellite was deployed into orbit. Kepler works by training its sensors on a specific patch of sky, monitoring the brightness of hundreds of thousands of stars at one time. The general purpose of Kepler is to further the understanding of planetary systems, but its more practical goal is to identify the number of planets that are in the habitable zone. By discovering Earth-like planets, Kepler continues the search for other life in a seemingly barren galaxy. Thus far Kepler has discovered 2,331 confirmed planets, 21 of which are less than twice Earth’s size and in the habitable zone. There are an additional 4,696 planets that are candidates. Additionally, it should be noted that it seems as though NASA did not report as many of Kepler’s findings during 2015, which is why that year has a far smaller total of planets discovered.
One would predict that as time goes on, the exoplanets we discover are further away. To test our hypothesis, this visualization plots each exoplanet's mean distance from Earth in Astronomical Units (~93 million miles, the average distance between Earth and the sun) against the discovery year of that exoplanet.
At a first glance, we see that this is only the case for a few exoplanets. Many nearby exoplanets weren't found until recent years, indicating that another factor is working behind the scenes. By categorizing the exoplanets via discovery method, we see that each method specializes in finding exoplanets of similar distance. Some methods that excel in finding nearby exoplanets weren't discovered until recent years, which explains the close distance of many recently discovered exoplanets.
To become a candidate for a potentially habitable exoplanet is a rigorous process, since life as we know it requires very specific conditions to thrive. This visualization serves as an example of how quickly planets are thinned when we apply the criteria for a planet to be habitable. Boundaries for habitation in the attributes plotted are shown with gray lines. Anything within the plotted rectangle is suitable for habitation by conservative estimates. Optimistic estimates would yield a larger area of suitability. Read more on these values here.
We first plot all exoplanets by radius and mass, where both attributes are measured in Earth Units (i.e. the respective radius and mass values for Earth). A habitable planet should have a reasonable radius (between 0.8 and 2 Earth radii) and mass (between 0.5 and 5 Earth masses). As planets fall out of these boundaries, the existence of liquid water becomes less and less likely.
These first 2 criteria clearly cut down our prospects by quite a bit! However, there are plenty more planets to sift through before we find possible new Earths.
You may notice that there appears to be a trendline in the points. This is due to the large number of radius and mass values that had to be approximated due to lack of data. For many exoplanets, quite a few attributes have to be approximated due to the difficulty in attaining accurate readings. These approximations will not throw off our final results though, so do not worry.
Next, we need to assess the suitability of the climate on the exoplanets. Most life as we know it can only exist within a relatively constrained boundary of temperatures: those where liquid water can exist in at least some areas of the planet. The two values we filter next by are mean solar flux and mean surface temperature.
Mean solar flux is the mean solar electromagnetic radiation that a planet receives from its sun. Too much solar radiation and water will vaporize on the planet, too little and water will be frozen. Mean equilibrium temperature of a planet is strongly tied to solar flux, and helps establish if there is enough of an atmosphere to retain the heat from the planet's sun. Too thin or dense of an atmosphere will leave the planet uninhabitable.
Now we have signficantly limited our prospects of habitable exoplanets, however those that remain are very good candidates.
You may have noticed that Earth is on the upper edge of both our solar flux boundary and temperature boundary. That's not a mistake, Earth is hugging the inside of the habitable zone of our solar system. If we were just a tad closer to the sun, Earth would experience a runaway greenhouse effect from too much solar radiation, and all of the water on the planet would vaporize!
The last two attributes of habitability we graph by are Habitable Zone Distance (HZD) and Habitable Zone Atmosphere (HZA). They are two measuring tools established by the Planetary Habitability Laboratory that combine multiple factors into a measure of habitability.
Anything outside of the HZD boundaries is either too close to the sun or too far away. Anything outside of the HZA boundaries has either too thin of an atmosphere to too dense. As you can see, all of our candidates fall well within the boundaries, which means they are possible candidates for habitation!
We are left with 12 candidates for potential new Earths. All candidates are terran-type planets like Earth, although interestingly none of them have stars like our sun (G-Type). The majority of these final exoplanets have red dwarfs for a sun (M-type). This requires the planet to orbit much closer to the star to be within the habitable zone. Check out these planets in more detail below!
This project was created for an undergraduate Data Visualization class at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. All data was sourced from the Planetary Habitability Laboratory.
Developer
Troll
Idea Man
Developer